The Paradox of the CLT Practice in Indonesia: Challenges and Constraints

Authors

  • shofie Yogyakarta State University
  • Fahry Rizaldy Putra Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69820/jeltlal.v2i1.126

Keywords:

communicative language teaching, communicative competence, challenges and constraints

Abstract

Indonesia has already used the communicative language teaching (CLT) approach for more than two decades, and research from that time reveals its challenges. This paper aims to synthesize past research to address challenges and constraints in CLT implementation and then suggest ways to tackle the mentioned challenges and constraints. The comprehensive framework from Fadilah (2018) was used to identify four broad categories of challenges. This helped us classify challenges by source and then to solve them. The finding of this study by analyzing Indonesian CLT implantation research is that the challenges of CLT can be divided into four frameworks: a) societal classroom constraints include teacher beliefs, teacher beliefs vs students’ preferences, and teachers' workload; b) socioeconomic constraints include class size, grammar-based syllabus, the low of students’ participation, unequal educational recourses c) cultural constraints include, local norms, students anxiety, and embarrassment; d) ideological constraints include English as a foreign language. Further, this paper concludes that these challenges are interconnected and require a systematic approach, with government intervention as a potential first step. This paper offers research-based practical and theoretical recommendations to develop the CLT practice in a specific context. 

References

Agustien, H. (2004). A Setting Up New Standards: Preview of Indonesia’s New Competence-Based Curriculum. 15(1), 1–13.

Alamri, W. A. (2018). Communicative Language Teaching: Possible Alternative Approaches to CLT and Teaching Contexts. English Language Teaching, 11(10), 132. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n10p132

Ariatna. (2016). The Need for Maintaining CLT in Indonesia. TESOL Journal, 7(4), 800–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.246

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING. Applied Linguistics, I(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002

Christianto, D. (2019). TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USE OF THE COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING APPROACH IN THE ENGLISH CLASSROOMS. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 3(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v3i1.1707

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2000). EA Journal; v.18 n.1 p.22-30; Winter 2000, 18(1), 22–30.

Fadilah, E. (2018). Rethinking the Maintenance of CLT in Indonesia: A Response to Ariatna’s “The Need for Maintaining CLT in Indonesia.” TESOL Journal, 9(1), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.341

Gloriez, P. (2022). Communicative Language Teaching and Its Implementation in Online Learning: The Teachers’ Voice. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.751

Hien, L. T. N. (2021). Communicative Language Teaching in Teaching ESL for University Students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(6), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.6.7

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. (pp. xviii, 258). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An Exploration of Chinese EFL Learners’ Unwillingness to Communicate and Foreign Language Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00687.

Marcellino, M. (2015). ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN INDONESIA: A CONTINUOUS CHALLENGE IN EDUCATION AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 19(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v19i1/57-69

Musthafa, B. (2015). Communicative Language Teaching in Indonesia: Issues of Theoretical Assumptions and Challenges in the Classroom Practice. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 12(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v12i2/184-193

Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587464

Rahman, A. (2018). EMERGING FACTORS OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING (CLT) AND ITS APPLICATION IN INDONESIAN ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE (EFL) CLASSROOMS. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 3(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v3i2.587

Rahmawati, Y. (2018). TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH IN INDONESIAN CLASSROOMS. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v5i1.9881

Riadi, A. (2019). An Empirical Studies on Indonesian English-Curriculum Changes: Opportunities and Constraints in an Underdeveloped Region. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v1i2.835

Sari, A. R. (2020). Kelancaran dan Akurasi dalam Communicative Language Teaching. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi Ayo Guru Berbagi. https://ayoguruberbagi.kemdikbud.go.id/artikel/kelancaran-dan-akurasi-dalam-communicative-language-teaching/

Sotlikova, R., & Sugirin, S. (2016). TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON USING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE ENGLISH CLASS.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Grading and Differentiation: Paradox or Good Practice? Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_11

Yanti, G. S. (2019). PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF INDONESIAN TEACHERS TOWARD COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING. 5(1). http://journal.stbapontianak.ac.id/index.php/spectral/article/view/33

Downloads

Published

2024-05-29

How to Cite

shofie, & Fahry Rizaldy Putra. (2024). The Paradox of the CLT Practice in Indonesia: Challenges and Constraints. Journal of English Language Teaching, Literatures, Applied Linguistic (JELTLAL), 2(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.69820/jeltlal.v2i1.126

Issue

Section

Articles