Interaction Patterns and Verbal Development in a TPR-Based Preschool EFL Classroom: A Qualitative Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69820/jeltlal.v4i1.516Keywords:
Total Physical Response, Interaction Patterns, Verbal Development, Young Learners, TEYL (Teaching English to Young Learners), Case Study, Preschool EFL Classroom.Abstract
This study investigates the development of classroom interaction patterns and students’ verbal ability in a Total Physical Response (TPR)-based English classroom for young learners. Conducted as a qualitative case study at Excellent Academy (pre-school EFL classroom), the research involved eight students aged 4 to 6 years with diverse characteristics. Data was collected through classroom observations, field notes, interviews, and verbal coding rubric across six instructional meetings, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that interaction patterns initially followed a highly teacher- entered Initiation–Response–Feedback (IRF) structure, with students responding primarily through physical actions. Over time, interaction evolved into a more dynamic and participatory process, marked by the emergence of peer interaction and studentled activities, although the IRF framework remained dominant. In terms of verbal development, students demonstrated gradual progression from pre-verbal to emerging, developing, and advanced stages. This development was supported by repeated exposure, multimodal input, scaffolding, and opportunities for pushed output. The study supports key theoretical perspectives, including TPR, Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, and Swain’s Output Hypothesis, highlighting the importance of structured input and interactive learning environments in early language acquisition. Despite variations in learners’ backgrounds, all students showed improvement in verbal production. The findings
suggest that TPR is an effective approach for fostering both interaction and early language development in young learners,
Although integrating more communicative strategies may further enhance peer interaction and language use.
References
Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., M. Ameen, B. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
Asher, James. J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53, 3–17.
Celik, T. I., Cay, T., & Kanadli, S. (2021). The Effect of Total Physical Response Method on Vocabulary Learning/Teaching: A Mixed Research Synthesis. English Language Teaching, 14(12), 154. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n12p154
Chiluisa Chicaiza, C. G., & Guamán Luna, M. M. (2025). The effectiveness of total physical response in vocabulary learning for a1 students: A literature review. Religación, 10(46), e2501450. https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v10i46.1450
Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Studies, S. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning.
Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. . Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Cole, R. (2024). Inter-Rater Reliability Methods in Qualitative Case Study Research. Sociological Methods and Research, 53(4), 1944–1975. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241231156971
Coombs, H. (2022). Case Study Research Defined-Single or Multiple?-Definition of a Case Study. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7604301
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
Demircan, U., Kurnaz, B., & Türkel, A. (2023). STUDY OF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVE SPEECH RUBRİC. In IJLER International Journal of Language and Education Research (Vol. 5, Number 1).
Emilio Martinez Barrios, H., David Salcedo Mosquera, J., & Romero Sánchez, A. (2022). OBSERVATION AS A RESEARCH TECHNIQUE. (REFLECTIONS, TYPES, RECOMMENDATIONS AND EXAMPLES). In RUSSIAN LAW JOURNAL: X. Martínez-Cansola.
Ghufran Hashmi, S. (2025). Sinclair and Coulthard Model: Understanding Linguistic Choices and Patterns in Classroom Teaching. International Journal of Teaching, Learning and Education (IJTLE), 4(3), 2583–4371. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijtle
Krashen, S. D. . (1985). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chen, H. C. (2024). Teaching Young EFL Learners New Vocabulary: A Comparison of the Efficiency of Traditional and Personalized TPR Strategies. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241288924
Liu, Z., Sun, D., Zhang, L., Wang, X., & Yang, Y. (2025). The impact of classroom interaction on willingness to communicate: The mediating roles of speaking self-efficacy and foreign language enjoyment. PLOS ONE, 20(7 July). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328226
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Academic Press.
Mashuri, S., Sarib, M., Rasak, A., & Alhabsyi, F. (n.d.). Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies Ruslin. 12(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229
McLeod, S. (2024). Ethnography In Qualitative Research What is Ethnography?
Mezmir, E. A. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Overview of Data Reduction, Data Display and Interpretation. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.7176/rhss/10-21-02
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
Putri, A. R. (2016). TEACHING ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS USING A TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) METHOD. In Jurnal Edulingua | (Vol. 3, Number 2).
Skukauskaite, A., Rangel, J., Garcia, L., Denise, R., & Ramón, K. (2015). Understanding Classroom Discourse and Interaction: Qualitative Perspectives.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Routledge.
Syafei, M., Yudhi Nugroho, K., Dwi Nurcahyo, A., Sulistyowati, T., Kurniati, D., Riyono, A., & Wigati, S. (2025). TPR in Practice: Nurturing English Skills in Early Childhood through Movement and Media. 6(1), 141–160. http://conference.unisma.ac.id/index.php/ICON/ICON-ELT
Tajik, O., Golzar, J., & Noor, S. (2024). | P a g e Purposive Sampling. In IJELS (Number 2).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xie, R. (2021). The effectiveness of total physical response (Tpr) on teaching english to young learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1202.11
Xu, Z. (2014). The bilingual reform: a paradigm shift in foreign language teaching. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(3), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.776843
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish, Second Edition (Second). Guilford Publications.
Zhao, X. (2025). A Review of Total Physical Response. Literature Language and Cultural Studies, 101. https://doi.org/10.63313/llcs.9016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anggit Laesa Oktaviani, Devian Try Gustary, Gunawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







